But that imminent reprieve from the NDP certainly doesn't mean that there isn't another network of powerful control freaks lurking, biding their time for the next opportunity to fundamentally change the way we live our lives.

I’m talking about the United Nations.

The UN just wrapped up their 4th Environment Assembly in Nairobi, Kenya. And the language coming out of that conference should raise the neck hairs on freedom lovers all across the globe. They want to “transform the way we live” through a “New World Order.” Those are their words, not mine.

This elite conference was underreported in the mainstream media, but it was heavily documented by the conservative New American Magazine. The New American keeps their eye on the United Nations in a way we never see done by the mainstream information gatekeepers, providing in-depth coverage on prominent summits, as well as the smaller ones like Nairobi.

My guest tonight is Alex Newman, author and star columnist at The New American. We are discussing his coverage of recent events from the United States and around the world, from the United Nations to Donald Trump's new climate panel, to New York's recent walk towards infanticide.

It’s called the 63rd Commission on the Status of Women and the two week long gathering is hosted by the United Nations.

At the conference feminists, politicians, control freaks and bureaucrats meet to plot the next stage in global women’s advancement. But, they aren’t focused on real things, like getting women the franchise in Saudi Arabia or freedom from a compulsory hijab in Iran.

No, these do-gooders are focused on intersectional feminism, climate change and freeing women from the shackles of the patriarchy.

Patriarchy, by the way, is just progressive shorthand for “loving, stable familial relationships.”

I’ve been to this sort of crazy UN conference before, but never to this one, so I’m dying to know what kind of third-wave feminist madness is unfolding behind closed doors.

Fortunately, I found a pro-family conservative who’s at the conference to give us the inside scoop.

Joining me tonight from Campaign Life Coalition in an interview we recorded yesterday afternoon, is conservative, pro-life activist Mattea Merta.

Canada is about to sign onto this agreement but many Canadians are in the dark about what the agreement is and what it will do to Canadian sovereignty.

This global compact for migration isn't about refugees, or people fleeing violence, persecution, war, disease or even famine.

It’s about economic migration and even more broadly — migration for any reason whatsoever.

Signatories to the agreement will agree to make migration from one country to another a human right and not something determined exclusively by a sovereign state based upon merit and needs.

But with imaginary human rights, come some very real costs. Much of the pact is focused on ensuring that benefits, supports, training, and healthcare are not denied to economic migrants due to their migration status.

The mainstream media in Canada hasn’t really been talking about the global compact on migration nor have they been discussing what unrestrained migration will do to Canada, and the reason for that is written into the pact itself.

One objective of the pact is to “promote independent, objective and quality reporting of media outlets including by sensitizing media professionals on migration-related issues and terminology.”

The non-Orwellian translation? One objective of the pact is to train reporters to use UN approved words in order to favourably cover mass migration.

So, what happens to media outlets who refuse to comply with the UN whitewashing of migration-related news? The pact has an answer for that, too.

Section 17 calls for “investing in ethical advertising, restricting public funding and material support to media outlets that systematically promote intolerance, xenophobia, racism and other forms of discrimination towards migrants.”

In other words, if a reporter in a country that has signed the pact tells the truth about mass migration, they could cause their media outlet to lose a bailout, advertising money, grant, or in the CBC’s case, a subsidy.

Joining me tonight is someone who noticed the problem with the global compact on migration and decided to do something about it by starting a House of Commons e-petition with her friend George Brown calling on the government to walk away from the pact. That petition is now sponsored by People's Party of Canada MP, Maxine Bernier

My guest via Skype from Sault Saint Marie is citizen activist, Catherine Bayne.